Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellp
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:08, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Ellp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article PROD was repeatedly removed without improvement by SPA author. The references are weak; there is no evidence of notability. Rhadow (talk) 15:11, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I think it should be deleted since it's clearly not notable per se. And the person who created it made almost 70% of all its edits, plus he curiously named his account same with the article revealing clear intent for advertizing Ammarpad (talk) 15:37, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:40, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:40, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:40, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete if you remove the promotion it just becomes an assertion of existence. Not notable (yet). W Nowicki (talk) 22:39, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.